



I just found this batch of rejects for The Economist. I was surprised at how many shots we'd had at the brief. I knew the work was getting past the Creative Director, because I was he. It must've been the client. I can't remember who first coined that phrase ‘bouncebackability’, (I think it was a footballing Ian, Holloway or possibly Dowie), but it's a crucial, if unglamorous skill every creative needs. Your ideas are torched every single day. As good as you get at debating, persuading and plain arguing, you're still going to go again, again and again on the same brief. You need to be positive every time. Anyway, The Economist, it was a tough brief, after years of using advertising spaces to flatter the readers intelligence, we now needed to tell them 'Great news - Colour pictures!' It was difficult to think how this wasn't a clash with the high brow image of our reader that had been carefully built up over the years. We tried to be Economisty, but talk about colour.1st GO.



REJECTED:'Too like the regular Economist work'. (Spelling 'hear' wrong probably didn't help.)


















Rejected; 'Too clever-clever'.6th GO.





Although in retrospect, I think I prefer the 'clever-clever' campaign.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere. uis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.
Delete